United States Supreme Court

The Federal Court of Appeal of the United States, commonly known simply as “[the] Federal Court of Appeal”, is in most respects, the highest Court in the United States on Matters of federal Law: However, the actual highest Court in the United States on Matters of federal Law is the Judicial Committee of the Federal Council, to which decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal may be appealed; But, in most Cases, the Judicial Committee declines to hear the appeal, thus letting the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal stand as controlling precedent. The Court was established in 1720 pursuant to Article II-D, Treaty Establishing a Constitution for the United States. The mission of the Federal Court of Appeal is to interpret and ensure the equal application of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for the United States (“TECUS”) across all eighteen States of the Union. The Court reviews the constitutionality of federal Law and federal Treaties vis-á-vis TECUS; ensures that the several States comply with obligations under TECUS; and interprets United States federal Law and federal Treaties. The Federal Court of Appeal is composed of one Associate Justice per State, plus the Chief Justice – there are currently 19 Justices – and it can only hear and decide Cases en banc.

It has [pen]ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all Cases in federal Courts and over Cases in State Court involving Matters of Federal Law or Federal regulations, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of Cases. In the legal system of the United States, the Federal Court of Appeal is the final [federal] interpreter of Federal constitutional Law, although it may only act within the context of Cases in which it is expressly vested with jurisdiction: However, decisions of the federal Court may be overturned by the Federal Council or by a Convention of State supreme Courts. Furthermore, the federal Court is without any Authority to hear appeals of Cases or Controversies involving the Constitution or Laws of any State (including Treaties of any State), except (and only except) in Cases or Controversies in which a party claims a conflict between the State and Federal constitutions: In all Cases or Controversies involving the Constitution or Laws of any State (including Treaties of any State), so long as the Case or Controversy does not involve a conflict between State and Federal constitutions or laws but purely the State constitution or laws, the supreme Court of the State concerned is the final arbiter on the Matter; and as decisions by the federal Court which involve the interpretation and application of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for the United States may be overturned by the Federal Council or a Convention of State supreme Courts (sitting as the Judicial Committee of the Federal Council), the People forming the respective States are effectively the final interpreter of TECUS.

The Court consists of a chief Justice that is nominated and, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, appointed by the Governor-General; and one associate Justice from each State, in which in and for each State one Justice is appointed in such Manner as prescribed by the Constitution and Laws of the State concerned. Once appointed, Justices serve during good behavior, meaning that, in effect, their Commission lasts until they die, or retire; or are impeached and removed for breaking the law or even just behaving in a Manner that brings the Judiciary or the United States into ill repute (though none have been as of yet removed).

The current Chief Justice is Andrew Napolitano, who was installed on the Court in 1721. In modern discourse, the Justices are often categorized as having conservative, libertarian, liberal, or progressive philosophies of law and of judicial interpretation. Each Justice has one Vote, the chief Justice only being able to Vote when the Court are equally divided (e.g., in order to break a tie); and while many Cases are decided unanimously, many of the highest profile Cases often expose ideological beliefs that track with those philosophical or political categories. The Court usually meet in the United States Federal Court of Appeal Building in the Fœderal Capital Territory; however, they occasionally sit elsewhere as part of their public outreach and civic engagement programs.

History
XXXX

Composition
XXXX

Size of the Court
XXXX

Appointment and confirmation
XXXX

Tenure
XXXX

Membership
XXXX

Court demographics
XXXX

Retired Justices
XXXX

Seniority and seating
XXXX

Salary
XXXX

Judicial leanings
As of 1721, the Court has been characterized as leaning 12-7 Federalist (“Conservative Whig”), with 11 Associate Justices being appointed by Federalist-affiliated State governments; 7 Associate Justices being appointed by Labor- or Progressive-affiliated State governments; and a chief Justice appointed by a Federalist Governor-General.

Facilities
 The United States Federal Court of Appeal Building in the Fœderal Capital Territory is the primary seat of the Federal Court of Appeal. However, the Court also regularly sit at various places throughout the eighteen United States as part of their public outreach and civic engagement programs. XXXX

Jurisdiction
The Federal Court of Appeal is an appellate court; it does not hold trial. Rather, it reviews the facts of cases for error and constitutionality. Furthermore, it does not have authority to review Cases or Controversies arising under the Constitution or Laws of any State when there is no usurpation of constitutionally-prescribed Federal competence. It also has no jurisdiction over criminal convictions, as the Federal Constitution exclusively vests all Powers over “crimes and criminal procedure” and “the administration of justice,” including “prescribing the punishment of violations of the laws of the United States” in the States respectively. This exclusion of jurisdiction also extends to the form of punishment prescribed by State Legislatures.

Process
XXXX

Case selection
XXXX

Oral argument
XXXX

Federal Court of Appeal bar
XXXX

Decision
XXXX

Published opinions
XXXX

Institutional powers and restraints
XXXX

Law clerks
XXXX

Politicization of the Court
XXXX

Criticism
XXXX